From: vince@offshore.ai (Vincent Cate)
Newsgroups: sci.space.tech
Subject: Re: Landing a capsule on a huge airbag?
References: <9186edb5.0309190722.5848cb75@posting.google.com>   <HLMu7L.9B@spsy
stems.net>      <9186edb5.0309250822.18253903@posting.google.com> <200310011147
32.318152c9.smithm@SPAMBLOCK.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.88.68.33
Message-ID: <9186edb5.0310012151.60bad91a@posting.google.com>

Michael Smith <smithm@SPAMBLOCK.com.au> wrote in message
news:<20031001114732.318152c9.smithm@SPAMBLOCK.com.au>...
> I think a capsule is going to land moderately hard whatever you
> do to cushion the landing. Fully reusable may be impossible to
> achive, particularly because you won't have much control over the
> landing site so it is likely to sustain some damage on landing.

I am looking at the case where the capsule has some L/D (say 0.4)
and you have a parafoil with some L/D (say 4).  With these I think
you could control exactly where you land.  Note that a parafoil
can flare just before landing and kill almost all of the speed.
If you land on a huge airbag (think bigger than any stuntman
ever got) I don't think you need to damage anything.

> When landing on top of an airbag the CG is always going to be
> high _unless_ the airbag collapses under load. If you bounce back
> up after landing you are likely to come back down in a bad
> attitude.

Yes, in the same way that you don't want to bounce a stuntman
back up and maybe off the airbag.  You want to design for this.

> Have you considered a water landing?

I think a reusable capsule will last better if we keep it
away from salt water.

  -- Vince
